The best alternative is H2testw, which is free. There are six alternatives to FakeFlashTest for Windows and Linux. I have tried to google the 'problem' hoping to find similar cases, but no luck there. Much quicker than H2testw and is an app in the os & utilities category. So what's going on with FakeFlashTest? Is the message a false positive or what? Anyone got a clue? So the cards work absolutely fine, the read/write performance is fantastic too. I've also tried loading them up with 64gb worth of media and all the media works fine. The thing is though, both cards pass h2testw with a write speed of 40MB/s & read speed of 80MB/s for the entire 64gb of storage.ĬrystalDiskMark benchmarks results are also absolutely fine. I get a similar message from the other card, only from 1000'ishMiB to 37,902.0MiB. Well FakeFlashTest reports this BAD MEMORY from sector 107859 (52.0MiB) to sector 77624659 (37,902.0Mib) I always like to test my sd cards before I put them to use, so I run FakeFlashTest, H2testw & CrystalDiskMark to benchmark them. I've even bought from this seller before without issues. I recently bought two 64gb micro sd cards (Sandisk Ultra) from Ebay, the seller's called atmemory, he has a excellent rating & many sales. I am hoping someone might understand what's going on here and be able to explain to me if my cards are fine or not.
0 kommentar(er)
